Stephen Wood
2004-08-31 01:53:43 UTC
Roger:
What would you think of adding code to the phone support routines to
require that the attached phone model match the selected phone type? I
think the firmware request packet usually has enough information to tell
if the phone matches the model and carrier selected. getfundamentals
could return an error code in the dictionary it returns. We could have
an undocumented .bitpim parameter that would turn off this checking.
(Since the Sanyo phones are quite similar, it is still useful to be able
to request protocol dumps from users of new Sanyo phones).
A more radical thought I have is to disable the File System view,
unless an undocumented parameter is set. I'm not sure if I would be in
favor of it, but I figure I might as articulate the thought.
Stephen
What would you think of adding code to the phone support routines to
require that the attached phone model match the selected phone type? I
think the firmware request packet usually has enough information to tell
if the phone matches the model and carrier selected. getfundamentals
could return an error code in the dictionary it returns. We could have
an undocumented .bitpim parameter that would turn off this checking.
(Since the Sanyo phones are quite similar, it is still useful to be able
to request protocol dumps from users of new Sanyo phones).
A more radical thought I have is to disable the File System view,
unless an undocumented parameter is set. I'm not sure if I would be in
favor of it, but I figure I might as articulate the thought.
Stephen